Entries by Daryl Lim

US-China Dialogue | Visits, Meetings, & Conferences

Over the past week, I traveled through Xi’an, Hangzhou, Shenzhen, and Beijing with a delegation of U.S. intellectual property stakeholders.

Visits to Alibaba, Tencent, and Insta360 offered valuable perspectives on how leading Chinese companies are approaching innovation, artificial intelligence, intellectual property, and global markets. We also visited Dentons and participated in seminars that brought together representatives from government, law firms, industry, and academia for candid discussions of patent litigation, licensing, emerging technologies, and cross-border IP practice.

At the Supreme People’s Court, we engaged directly with judges about intellectual property adjudication and developments in our respective legal systems.

I was especially pleased to meet Penn State Dickinson Law student Shanell Powell, who is completing an internship with GEN Law, a leading intellectual property law firm in China. Shanell joined us for our visit to Tencent, where she observed a dialogue between our delegation and Tencent’s legal leadership. It was gratifying to see one of our students gaining firsthand exposure to international legal practice and high-level cross-border engagement.

In Beijing, I was honored to deliver opening remarks at the 2026 China-U.S. Intellectual Property Cooperation Dialogue at Renmin University of China. The Dialogue provided a forum for experts from both countries to address areas of disagreement, identify shared challenges, and consider opportunities for continued cooperation.

The visit also allowed us to deepen ties with several leading law schools, including those at Tsinghua University, Renmin University of China, Peking University (Beida), and the University of Science and Technology Beijing. I extended invitations to several key stakeholders to continue these conversations with us at the Hansen IP Conference at Fordham.

At a time when the broader relationship between the United States and China is increasingly complex, sustained professional and academic engagement matters. Dialogue does not require agreement. It does require listening, candor, and a willingness to keep channels of communication open.

My thanks to our hosts, organizers, speakers, and fellow delegates for their generous hospitality and thoughtful exchanges. I look forward to building on these relationships and continuing the dialogue.

US-China Dialogue | Remarks

I was honored to represent Penn State Dickinson Law at the 2026 China–U.S. Intellectual Property Dialogue in Beijing, hosted by Renmin University of China Law School and the Intellectual Property Law Association of the China Law Society.
You can find my remarks below.
I also had the privilege of moderating a timely discussion on standard-essential patents and global licensing, featuring views from Guobin Cui, Mark Cohen, Zhang Guangliang, John Kinton, John F. Duffy, David Kappos, Ma Yide, Jing He, and Randall R. Rader.
The broader dialogue brought together leading judges, scholars, policymakers, practitioners, and industry representatives to consider artificial intelligence, digital content, pharmaceutical innovation, technology transfer, and international coordination in intellectual property protection.
My thanks to Renmin University of China, our partner institutions, the organizers, and all the participants who engaged seriously across differences, and helped ensure that dialogue leads not only to understanding, but also to action.
_
[Edited Remarks]
President Ma, Chief Judge Li, Vice President Yang, Dean Yang, Judge Rader, friends, ladies and gentlemen:
More than three centuries ago, Emperor Kangxi commissioned a scientific survey of China. Chinese scholars worked with European Jesuits, including Joachim Bouvet. They combined local knowledge with astronomical observation and triangulation. The resulting atlas (皇舆全览图), published in 1717, blended European geographic knowledge and Chinese cosmological tradition, setting the standard for the world.
Cooperation did not erase their differences. It made a more accurate map possible.
That is a useful image for our work. We are not here to make China and the United States see every issue in the same way.
As the Chinese classics teach, the principled seek harmony without demanding uniformity, while the narrow-minded demand uniformity without achieving harmony. It is from harmony that peace arises.
君子和而不同,小人同而不和;和谐则太平之所兴也.
We are here to draw a more accurate map of our differences, our interdependence, and what cooperation might make possible.
The United States recently marked its 250th year of independence.
But its constitutional system did not arrive fully formed in 1776. Eleven years later, delegates met in Philadelphia because the existing arrangements were not working. They began with disagreement, but stayed in the room long enough to imagine a new framework.
We can borrow something from that spirit.
Think of this gathering as a constitutional convention for US-China IP policy. Not a place where agreement is assumed, but a place where partners boldly imagine arrangements that none could design alone.
That work is urgent because direct human contact is diminishing.
The number of Americans studying in China has fallen from about 11,000 in 2019 to fewer than 2,000 in 2026. The number of Chinese students in the United States has also declined, from a peak of 370,000 to 260,000. The exchange is profoundly asymmetric, and both streams are drying up.
When face-to-face contact disappears, caricature fills the vacuum.
We need friends on both sides who know the other country’s people, history, and culture. All of us here have the responsibility to make that contact possible again. And hopefully establish rotating host schools for this dialogue in the US just like we do with IPSC and PatCon. It is good that Professors John Duffy (Virginia), Anupam Chander (Georgetown), and William Fisher (Harvard) are part of this program.
We can ask not only what advances a national position today, but what makes an international system legitimate and sustainable over time.
The recent controversy over the Molly Tea|LV ruling comes after two other recent trademark cases in China also sparked backlash online. Both cases involved well-known domestic consumer brands going after small family-run businesses for trademark infringement.
Concern over trademark bullying parallels concerns over patent bullying in the SEP space by owners or implementers depending on who you ask, and in the copyright space between developers and content creators.
Together with a delegation of U.S. stakeholders, I have traveled this week through Xi’an, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, and Beijing.
Dialogue must lead to action. It should help us understand where others stand, and then change what we are prepared to do.
This morning, we stand before a blank canvas:
If by our words and actions, we create new pathways for exchange, and a standing commitment to continue this work next year, we will have succeeded.
And if we succeed, none of us should leave unchanged. A real dialogue changes those who partake in it.
Let me close by saying that three centuries ago, China showed how cooperation made a new map possible.
Two hundred and fifty years ago, America showed how dialogue could become the basis for a new way of organizing ourselves.
Today, our words and can help ensure that we do not mistake rivalry for destiny.
Because 君子和而不同,小人同而不和;和谐则太平之所兴也.
The principled seek harmony without demanding uniformity, while the narrow-minded demand uniformity without achieving harmony. It is from harmony that peace arises.
Thank you.

South Korea | Conferences & Meetings

[South Korea]

Just returned from a fruitful time in South Korea. Grateful for the warm hospitality, insights, and friendships forged. Looking forward to continuing to deepen ties and explore new opportunities. You can read some of the highlights of my trip below.

Michael Aguinaldo | Yong Seok Ahn | Minryung Baek | Jaehyung Ban | Friso Bostoen | Hye Won Chin | Yo Sop Choi | Nansulhun Choi | Ariel Ezrachi | Joy Fuyuno | Joseph Han | Seung Hyuck Han | Dae Sik Hong | Gus Hurwitz | Maria Ioannidou | Jae Hun Jeong | Youngeun Jo | Biung-Ghi Ju | Jinyul JU | Ryan Il Kang | Hee Eun (Erin) Kim | Kumsun Kim | In-Sang Kim | Songrim KOO | William E. Kovacic | Hwa Ryung Lee | Kyung Yul Frederick Lee | Hwang LEE | Sangyun Lee | Soojin Lee | Haesung Lee | Suhyun Lee | Hemi Lee | Bong Eui Lee | Yong Lim | Hak Joon Moon | Soojin Nam | John Newman | Julian Nowag | Barak Orbach | Woochul Park | Hyoyeon Ra | Hyunmin Seo | Emily Seo | Donghwan Shon | Jae Han Sim | D. Daniel Sokol | Jiyeon Song | Darko Spasevski | Sayaka Takizawa | Masako Wakui | Bingwan Xiong | Sang Seung Yi | Christopher Yoo | Jinha Yoon | Young Gug You | Vanessa Yanhua Zhang | Young Gi Kim | Jaewoong Kang | Haksoo Ko | Eun-Ju Lee | Nataliya Kosmyna | Young Hoan Cho | Hollis Robbins | Fernando Perez-Cruz | Soohyung Lee | Sunseop Jung | Lewis Z. Liu | Trisha Ray | Gregory C. Allen | Rebecca Portnoff | Liz “Kyo-Hwa” Chung | Jiyeon Cho | Elena Martellozzo | Leah A. Plunkett | Haemin Lee | Kisoon Ahn | Yohan Jo | Trevor Quick | Brian Wha-li Tang | Sangchul Park | Xin Dai | Martin Ebers | Kien Tran | Brian Merchant | Sangduk Lee | Jeong-Soo Kang | Na Yeon Lee | Ahran Park | Yong Suk Lee | Rebecca Hinds | Hyunji Kwon | Bohyun Park | Nicholson Price | Julia Adler-Milstein | Paige Nong | Charlotte Tschider | Hyeonhoon Lee | Soo-Yong Shin | Jae-Hyup Lee | Yury Dvorkin | Thomas Le Goff | Sang Min Roh | Bryan H. Choi | Hwayoung “Edward” Lee | David G. Widder | Woodrow Hartzog | Jieun Hwang | HyunCheol Jeong | Bo Kim | Royce Wee | Stephan Sonnenberg | Aly Moosa | Dema Lham | Joan Yoo | Paul Scharre | Alex Joel | Branka Marijan | Pak Shun Ng | Mun-eon Park | Jiyoung Yi | Kisu Kim | Fan Yang | Takesoo Jung | Sungyup Woo | Woohyun Won | Saige Lim | Jihoon Choi | Jeongwon Jo | Woohyung Lim | Seung Woo Son | Diane Hong | Jinsoo Lee | Kijeong Jeon

https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/news/associate-dean-daryl-lim-presents-at-lg-ai-research-yulchon-seminar

https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-society/2026/06/24/6F3YXJPJXRC2XL6NOYOZGVQNV4/

https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/news/associate-dean-daryl-lim-invited-by-korea-high-ip-high-court-to-discuss-global-ip-litigation

https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/news/associate-dean-daryl-lim-speaks-at-seoul-ai-policy-conference

Penn State Dickinson Law

Emily C. and John E. Hansen IP Institute at Fordham Law School

LG AI Research

Yulchon LLC

Seoul National University

Korea Radio Interview | Why AI Giants Are Turning to Korea

It was a pleasure to join Morning Wave in Busan on BeFM to discuss why global AI companies are increasingly turning to Korea.

The next phase of AI will depend not only on models, apps, and chatbots, but also on chips, data centers, energy, robotics, and manufacturing. Korea brings many of these pieces together.

Korea is not just buying AI. Korea is helping build it.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIwudczWRGQ&t=4012s

Penn State Dickinson Law

Searching for A New Home | Chicago Aikikai

For over ten years, I have had the privilege of training with Chicago Aikikai (https://www.chicagoaikikai.org/), a community devoted to the practice of aikido, a non-competitive Japanese martial art centered on balance, focus, and the redirection of force.
Founded in 1963 as the Illinois Aikido Club, Chicago Aikikai was the first dojo in the Midwest dedicated to aikido. After many years at its current Chicago Avenue location, the club must move and is looking for a permanent home in the city.
Chicago Aikikai is a nonprofit organization with a welcoming community, excellent instruction, and a remarkable history in Chicago. A suitable space would help preserve that tradition for current and future students.
If you know of a potential location, or someone who may be able to help, please contact chiaikikai@gmail.com.

Penn State Dickinson Law | Lewis Katz

A pleasant surprise to see Lewis Katz recognized in the New Jersey Hall of Fame display at Newark Liberty International Airport.
@pennstatedickinsonlaw, his legacy remains part of our daily life through Lewis Katz Hall at Carlisle and Lewis Katz Building at University Park, named in honor of his extraordinary generosity and commitment to legal education (see https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/about/our-community).
A meaningful reminder that the impact of visionary leaders continues well beyond their lifetimes.

WIPO | E-Commerce Dialogue

A meaningful visit to Geneva and the World Intellectual Property Organization – WIPO to facilitate the WIPO Dialogue on IP Protection in E-Commerce. The inaugural Dialogue brought together representatives of Member States, e-commerce platforms, and other partners to consider practical and collaborative approaches to combating online sales of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit trade in digital markets is a cross-border challenge that no government, platform, or rights holder can address effectively alone. Meaningful progress depends on sustained cooperation, workable enforcement mechanisms, and trust among the relevant stakeholders in future Dialogue sessions.

My thanks to Edward Kwakwa, Todd Reves, Giulia Ragonesi, and their team for the invitation, their warm hospitality, and the opportunity to contribute to this important conversation.

Delighted to meet with Director General Daren Tang. His appointment to a second term reflects Member States’ confidence in his leadership at a time when WIPO’s convening role is especially important. The organization’s work in bringing together governments, innovators, creators, businesses, and other stakeholders is essential to advancing innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship in an increasingly interconnected economy.

I was also pleased to visit the exhibition “JOURNEY of INSPIRATION: Empowering Community through Intellectual Property – Design and Creativity,” which opened in connection with the appointment of Her Royal Highness Princess Sirivannavari Nariratana Rajakanya of Thailand as WIPO’s first Ambassador for Fashion and Design. The exhibition offered a compelling illustration of how cultural heritage, design, and the strategic use of intellectual property can create opportunity for artisans and local communities. Details: https://lnkd.in/gS2mVRG7 and https://lnkd.in/ggQ2g-mW

The visit also allowed me to reconnect with friends and colleagues whose work strengthens the international intellectual property community, and to meet many new ones.

Lisa Jorgenson | Matteo Gragnani | Yasmina Al Abed | Dr. Ulrike Till | Michele Woods | Kathleen Peh | Eun-Joo Min | Hae-Jun Kim | Garrett Levin | Murthy Anil | Mohamed Emir Boulhadid | Martin Correa Finsterbusch | Victor Owade| Francis Gurry | Jennifer S. Lane | Monica A. Hernandez | Ameen Imam | Piotr Stryszowski | Jaroslaw Mrowiec | José Antonio Moreno Campos | Abdesslam Benzitouni | Afebuame Peters | Guadalupe Garcia Crespo | David Saussinan | Kamelia Dimitrova | Reggie Pamatian | Christine Pangilinan | Chen Hongbin | Cecilia Holmgren | Olivia Mazzucotelli | Chikako Konno | Yoshifumi Kusumoto | and more

Partnerships | NY | Brussels | Alicante

[New York | Brussels | Alicante]

New York: I had the pleasure of visiting Fish & Richardson P.C. and speaking with Michael Autuoro, Jeffrey Mok, Alexander M., and Tony Nguyen.

Brussels: I met European stakeholders across copyright, trademark, music, media, and policy circles, including Kristina Janušauskaitė (IFPI) Emilie Anthonis (MPA) Melanie Eve Amilhat (Paramount) Scott Martin (Aspen IP)

Alicante: I was honored to moderate an EUIPO comparative panel on iconic trademarks, bringing together perspectives from China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, and the United States. The discussion underscored how famous-mark protection remains deeply jurisdiction-specific, even as brands, markets, and enforcement strategies are increasingly global. EUIPO also invited me to sit for a short on-camera interview during the conference.

Sven Stürmann | Gordon Humphreys | Nina Korjus | Masatoshi Otsuka | Melanye K Johnson | Dr. Anke Nordemann-Schiffel | Chris Oldknow | Sukanya Wadhwa | Katie Goulding | William Valasidis | Pilar Montero | Andreas Renck | Yoshinobu Sato | Savvas Papasavvas | Ray Jang | Wei Chengcheng | and others.

Grateful to colleagues I mentioned above and many others I could not, for generous conversations, new ideas, and warm hospitality. I look forward to continuing these exchanges through future conferences, panels, and collaborations.

Celebrating | Hugh Hansen

[Celebrating Hugh Hansen on his 80th.]

Delighted to join Hugh for a belated mini-birthday celebration.

Hugh has been a teacher, scholar, advocate, and institution-builder. He did not merely teach IP law. He helped build the field.

When Hugh arrived at Fordham University School of Law, IP was niche. With vision, determination, and the support of forward-looking deans, he created a curriculum, brought together adjuncts and scholars, and helped make Fordham a global center for the study of IP.

But for many of us, Hugh’s greatest legacy is the global community he built.

As founder and director of the Emily C. and John E. Hansen IP Institute at Fordham Law School and its Annual IP Conference, he created one of the world’s essential gathering places for IP judges, scholars, practitioners, policymakers, agency leaders, and general counsel.

They came because Fordham was where one learned what was really happening. They came to be challenged and yet somehow leave the room feeling more alive, more informed, and more connected than before. Disagreements became memorable exchanges and most serious questions could be framed with wit. Panels felt, at their best, like spirited arguments around a kitchen table. He made Fordham a crossroads of the IP world, but also a place of friendship.

Managing IP called him an “IP provocateur” and “the ringmaster” behind one of the field’s must-attend events. He has shown us that a field is strengthened by honest disagreement conducted among people who respect one another enough to argue hard and return the next year.

Hugh’s genius was never merely convening important people. It was convening them in a way that made ideas matter more than hierarchy. He is a force of nature with a big heart. He is capable of making someone feel terrified, honored, and delighted within the same five minutes. He has the rare ability to unsettle a room and hold it together at the same time. He expects much from people because he believes they have something worth contributing. He opened doors, launched careers, and gave generations of IP lawyers and scholars the confidence that their ideas mattered.

At Fordham, the most senior judges, the most accomplished practitioners, and the newest scholars entered the same arena to learn, debate, have fun.

That motto captures Hugh perfectly. Serious, irreverent, demanding, generous, impatient with cant, allergic to pomposity, and deeply loyal to people and ideas. He made IP more global, more rigorous, more candid, and more human.

Happy 80th birthday, Hugh! Thank you for building not only a conference, but a community. Thank you for teaching us to learn, debate, and have fun, and for showing us that the best institutions are built not only with vision, but with courage, wit, loyalty, and love.

Catch the conference’s 25th commemorative video (from eight years ago) here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z4qYoL_-_w.