Bloomberg News | Lathan & Watkins AI Strategy

Latham & Watkins’ decision to build its own AI infrastructure points to a more interesting question than whether law firms should own GPUs. I shared my views on Latham’s AI strategy with Eric Killelea and Roy Strom for their excellent Bloomberg Law article. https://lnkd.in/g8YeAZfH Penn State Dickinson Law

Penn State | Singapore Delegation Visit 2026

One of the pleasures of returning to Singapore is the chance to carry earlier conversations forward and introduce colleagues who bring new perspectives to them. Our recent Penn State University delegation built on relationships developed over previous visits, exploring how we can work together in ways that benefit students, faculty, staff, and alumni. Meetings with universities, legal institutions, law firms, and industry partners covered student internships and exchanges, collaborative research and teaching, professional education, and the changes AI is bringing to legal practice. Traveling with colleagues from across Penn State helped connect these discussions with expertise and interests beyond the law school. For Penn State Dickinson Law, these relationships help connect our teaching and scholarship with international practice. For the wider University, they offer avenues for collaboration across law, AI, data science, and business. The conversations were richer because colleagues could ask different questions and recognize possibilities outside their own fields. I was particularly glad to gather with Penn State alumni and friends in Singapore. Our alumni are an important part of this work, bringing their experience, local knowledge, and relationships to the conversation. It was a pleasure to hear their stories and spend time together. The hospitality throughout the week meant a great deal: the care that went into arranging our visits, the openness of our discussions, and the welcome around so many tables. Thank you to my fellow delegates, Ángela Sánchez Gago, LL.M. | Guido Cervone | Joe Rively | Larry Catá Backer | Tom Lee | Scott Frank | Jing He | Lily Xue Dong, and to the colleagues whose support made the trip possible, including our former, acting, and interim deans Danielle Conway | Laura H. Williams | Sarah J. Williams, as well as our colleagues Josh Trego | Jessica Seretti. I have thanked our hosts and counterparts individually in the comments. I am grateful for the time and thought they shared with us. We returned with friendships renewed, new colleagues to work with, and a clear priority: following through on these conversations so that more of our Penn State community can take part.

Book Review | Inclusive Innovation in the Age of AI and Big Data

Grateful to see 'Inclusive Innovation in the Age of AI and Big Data' described as a “foundational text” in an in-depth scholarly review by Ashish Bharadwaj, published by Tom Cotter on Comparative Patent Remedies. When Peter Yu and I began developing this volume, we wanted to bring together scholars working across law, economics, policy, data, and technology to consider how we might ensure that innovation expands opportunity rather than reinforcing existing divides. The review notes the book’s effort to move beyond diagnosing disparities toward thinking concretely about institutions, incentives, governance, and the conditions needed for more inclusive innovation systems. Delighted to see the contributors’ collective work recognized. The volume reflects the insights of an extraordinary group of scholars: Brent Lutes | Michael Palmedo | Ryan Safner | Michelle Saksena | Gauri Subramani | Carlotta Nani | Martin Correa Finsterbusch| Julio D. Raffo | Mike Schuster | Miriam Bitton | Deborah Gerhardt | Jessica Lai | Jordana Goodman | Yan Li | Regan Murphy | Khamal Patterson, Esq., | Margo Bagley | Colleen Chien | Suzanne Harrison | Bowman Heiden | Paola Cecchi-Dimeglio | Deja Workman | Christopher Dancy | Dave Hunter | Keith Robinson | Jyh-An Lee | Jingwen Liu | My thanks to each of them, and to PETER DANIELL | Charlotte Kershaw at Oxford University Press for working with us to make the book a reality. More on the review: https://lnkd.in/gNWC36q3 https://lnkd.in/gFwm3kGn The book is available open access through Oxford University Press: https://lnkd.in/gNDKwx3q, with thanks to Penn State Institute for Computational and Data Sciences | Penn State Law, Policy and Engineering (LPE) Initiative | Penn State Dickinson Law | Jenni Evans | Danielle Conway | David Mazyck

Singapore | IP Week, Singapore Convention Week & More

One week in Singapore brought together an unusually rich intersection of intellectual property, AI, universities, government, courts, dispute resolution, industry, and international business. IP & Innovation Researchers of Asia (IPIRA) Academic Colloquium: joined scholars from across the region for discussions about IP, trade, technology, and innovation. Irene Calboli Althaf Marsoof Bernard Ong Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) Miranda Risang Ayu Palar, S.H., LL.M., Ph.D. Palar Yangzi Li Huijuan Peng NUS Faculty of Law: “IP in Asia: How Reliable IP Rights Foster Innovation, Economic Growth, and Global Competitiveness” roundtable Sandy Widjaja David Kappos Urška Petrovčič Burton Ong Sipim Wiwatwattana, Brian Prastyo Mary Allison Dellosa @Szu-Yuan Wang Chih-Chieh Yang Phan Ngoc Gia Bao Trang Nguyen Huijuan Peng Toshifumi Futamata Piergiuseppe Pusceddu Becky Fraser Collette Rawnsley Irene Calboli Ruben Duran Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) Singapore Convention Week signature event: Crystal Tan, Daniel Choo (朱灿堃)Eunice Chua Kevin Kwek Mariam (Maka) Gotsiridze Wei-Chieh Soo Wooi Tyng Tan Global Forum on IP: Mark Gray Anita Huss-Ekerhult Olivia Koentjoro Jing He Dr Stanley Lai, SC Nigel King Loo Fang Hui (卢芳晖) Saw Cheng Lim For Penn State, a week like this goes well beyond any individual conference or meeting. International relationships become most valuable when they create opportunities for others: joint research, visiting scholars and speakers, student opportunities, institutional partnerships, comparative teaching, professional programming, and connections with policymakers, courts, industry, and the profession. Singapore is an especially important place for building those relationships. Few jurisdictions bring together sophisticated legal institutions, world-class universities, policymakers, global technology companies, dispute-resolution institutions, and an ambitious innovation ecosystem in such close proximity. For Penn State Dickinson Law and the wider Penn State University, that creates opportunities to connect our strengths in AI, intellectual property, innovation, data, technology policy, and interdisciplinary research with partners confronting many of the same questions from different institutional and regional perspectives. Grateful to the many colleagues and friends who made the week so stimulating, productive, and enjoyable.

Sydney | IPSANZ & Meetings with UNSW, UTS, FCA, Allens, G+T, 5W and more

A productive week in Australia, anchored by the IPSANZ - The Intellectual Property Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. Annual Conference and a series of conversations that I hope will continue to strengthen connections across the region. At IPSANZ, I participated in two sessions on intellectual property, technology, and AI, building on relationships developed through the Hansen IP Institute at Fordham and exchanging perspectives with judges, academics, practitioners, and other leaders in the IP community. Many thanks to IPSANZ President Ian Horak KC and his team for the invite. The conference was also part of a broader week of relationship-building, including opportunities for exchange at Melbourne Law School's Francis Gurry Lecture featuring incoming Master of the Rolls Sir Colin Birss. [Watch my recent Penn State Dickinson Law Profiles in Leadership interview with Lord Justice Birss here: https://lnkd.in/gjUGtJQZ] Australia is grappling with many of the same questions that occupy us at in the U.S. around AI, innovation, competition, and technology governance, but sometimes with different doctrinal, cultural, and institutional starting points. Those comparative perspectives sharpen our own thinking and can feed directly into research and teaching. Just as importantly, sustained international relationships can create opportunities for faculty collaboration, visiting speakers, comparative research, student engagement, and institutional partnerships. They also help ensure that Penn State is not simply observing international conversations about the future of law and technology, but contributing to them. That exchange runs both ways. I returned with new perspectives and ideas, and had the opportunity to share some of the work taking place at Penn State Dickinson Law and across Penn State University with colleagues in Australia. Many thanks to IPSANZ and to the many colleagues who were so generous with their time, ideas, and hospitality. I look forward to continuing these conversations. Emily C. and John E. Hansen IP Institute at Fordham Law School | University of Technology Sydney | UNSW | Macquarie University | Deborah Healey | Weihuan Zhou | Lyria Bennett Moses | Alexandra George | Joseph Ng | May Fong Cheong | Michael Handler | David Yates | Michael Williams | John Lee | Colin Birss | Isabella Alexander | Sarah Tiffen | Andrew Fox SC | Alida Stanley | Joel Barrett | Rita Matulionyte | John Swinson | Isobel Patmore | Sally Davitt | Gillian Woon (云美卿) | Katarina Klaric | Ian Gault | Natalie Harre | Duncan Longstaff | The Hon Dr Annabelle Bennett AC SC FAA FAAL

PBS | “Meta is on trial – again. Here’s what to know about the case brought by dozens of states”

Hannah Grabenstein's PBS piece about the multistate litigation against Meta over youth safety, privacy, and social media design artfully captures its significance. The case reaches beyond the familiar debate over Section 230 and user-generated content. States are also challenging product design choices, safety practices, and public representations about how young people interact with social media. As I shared with her, litigation of this scale can influence behavior well beyond the courtroom. When design choices, internal safety research, or public statements create substantial legal exposure, lawyers and product teams have reason to scrutinize those decisions much earlier. The broader questions around platform accountability, youth safety, privacy, and product design will remain important regardless of the ultimate outcome of this case. https://lnkd.in/gPCsYmsu Penn State Dickinson Law

Profiles in Leadership | Francis Gurry

Pleased to share this episode of the Penn State Dickinson Law Profiles in Leadership series, featuring Dr. Francis Gurry, former Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization – WIPO. View our past episodes here: https://lnkd.in/ga4ezSqm. Few people have had as close a view of the transformation of intellectual property from a specialized legal field into a central part of the global innovation economy. Dr. Gurry’s career has unfolded alongside that transformation, giving him a distinctive perspective on how law and international institutions have had to adapt as technology, markets, and geopolitical influence have shifted. Our conversation begins with his early years in Australia and Cambridge before turning to the digital revolution and the rise of Asia as a major center of innovation. From there, we explore how WIPO responded to changes that often moved faster than traditional forms of international lawmaking could accommodate. A recurring theme is the importance of building institutions that can solve practical problems. We discuss the creation of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, the emergence of the UDRP in response to domain-name disputes, and the Marrakesh Treaty and Accessible Books Consortium as different examples of international cooperation taking shape through both law and implementation. Dr. Gurry also reflects candidly on becoming Director General after an election decided by a single vote and on leading WIPO through a period of significant institutional and geopolitical change. That experience ultimately included the extraordinary challenge of steering an international organization through the COVID-19 pandemic. Underlying the conversation is a broader question: how can international institutions remain relevant when technology, economic power, and political influence are changing simultaneously? It was a privilege to explore that question with someone who has played such a significant role in shaping the modern international intellectual property system. Watch here: https://lnkd.in/gXTKWavj Justin Kulp

Profiles in Leadership | Colin Birss

Pleased to share the latest episode of the Penn State Dickinson Law Profiles in Leadership series, featuring Sir Colin Birss, Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales and incoming Master of the Rolls. This may be Sir Colin’s first interview as incoming Master of the Rolls, offering a rare opportunity to hear directly from him about the experiences that have shaped his approach to judging and leadership, and what we might expect as he prepares to assume one of the most important judicial offices in England and Wales. His path to that role has been anything but conventional. He began by studying metallurgy and materials science at Cambridge and working with computers before building a distinguished career in intellectual property practice and then on the bench. Those experiences have given him a distinctive perspective on how courts should respond to technological change without losing sight of the craft of judging. Sir Colin reflects on why curiosity matters, why judges should seek to understand technology rather than be intimidated by it, and why institutions must be willing to experiment when better ways of working become possible. We also discuss the transition from advocate to judge, what makes advocacy effective from the other side of the bench, the people and experiences that shaped him, and the responsibilities that come with leading a judicial institution. What emerges is a thoughtful view of leadership grounded not in preserving established ways of doing things for their own sake, but in understanding what institutions are there to accomplish and being prepared to improve how they accomplish it. As Sir Colin prepares to become Master of the Rolls, this conversation offers an unusually timely window into the outlook he will bring to that role. Watch here: https://lnkd.in/gjUGtJQZ View past episodes of Profiles in Leadership here: https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/faculty/profiles-in-leadership Justin Kulp HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS)

Profiles in Leadership | Michael Aguinaldo

Pleased to share the latest episode of the Penn State Dickinson Law Profiles in Leadership series, featuring Michael Aguinaldo, Chairperson of the Philippine Competition Commission. His career offers a distinctive perspective on what institutional leadership requires when public trust, independence, and effective government all have to be earned at the same time. After nearly two decades in private practice, he moved into public service and went on to serve in the Office of the President, lead the Philippine Commission on Audit, and now head the country’s competition authority. Our conversation explores how those experiences shaped his approach to leadership. He reflects on the importance of listening before acting, exercising judgment without losing sight of institutional principles, and preserving independence in environments where legal, political, and practical pressures often intersect. One story captures that philosophy particularly well. A dispute over a $20 write-off becomes a lesson in proportionality, common sense, and the difference between enforcing rules mechanically and using them to make government work better. We also discuss what it takes to make competition law meaningful in a developing economy, where the success of an agency depends not only on doctrine and enforcement but also on whether ordinary citizens can see how competition affects their daily lives. He spoke about strengthening the Philippine Competition Commission’s capacity, managing political and corruption risks, and building an institution equipped for the challenges ahead. Watch here: https://lnkd.in/gmxsRQya View past episodes of Profiles in Leadership here: https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/faculty/profiles-in-leadership Justin Kulp

Law360 | “Stakes Are High In Meta Bellwether Social Media Trial”

Pleased to contribute to Bonnie Eslinger’s (Law360) excellent piece on the major bellwether litigation over Meta’s social media platforms and alleged harms to young users. One of the most significant questions in the case is whether traditional consumer protection law can operate as a form of platform governance. If states can successfully challenge product design features as unfair, or public assurances about safety as misleading in light of what a company knew internally, state attorneys general may have a powerful way to scrutinize platform design without waiting for Congress to create a new regulatory regime. The case also highlights an important distinction between proving that social media caused a particular individual’s psychiatric injury and establishing deception or unfair business practices. In the latter context, what a platform knew, what it said publicly, and what it did with that knowledge can take center stage. Article link behind paywall: https://www.law360.com/articles/2512379/stakes-are-high-in-meta-bellwether-social-media-trial.