Honored that my scholarship has been cited in both the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. These citations affirm the collaborative spirit of legal scholarship and research’s role in helping inform decisions at the highest levels.

The Bar Association of the District of Columbia referenced my article “I Dissent: The Federal Circuit’s “Great Dissenter,” Her Influence on the Patent Dialogue, and Why It Matters” (Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law) in an amicus brief before the D.C. Circuit (Hon. Pauline Newman v. Hon. Kimberly A. Moore, et al.).

Additionally, four U.S. Supreme Court briefs cited my work:

– “I Dissent” in Miller Mendel, Inc. v. City of Anna, Texas

– “The Influence of Alice (Minnesota Law Review Headnotes)” in

Realtime Data, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc., et al.

– “Trademark Confusion Revealed (American University Law Review)” in Relish Labs LLC v. Grubhub Inc., as well as by constitutional law and intellectual property scholars in the Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products LLC case.

#PennStateDickinsonLaw #LegalScholarship

https://dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/associate-dean-daryl-lims-articles-cited-court-appeals-dc-circuit-and-us-supreme-court